« Back to main site AECB logo the sustainable building association
Welcome, Guest. Not sure where to start? Click here for a short introduction. Otherwise Please login or register.
Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
News: You can mark all posts in a board as read so that new posts show up.

+  AECB Forum
|-+  Technical Forums
| |-+  Materials and products (Moderators: Chris Herring, Mark Siddall)
| | |-+  Insulating material receives EST support
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Insulating material receives EST support  (Read 1756 times)
David OLIVIER
AECBmember

Posts: 768


View Profile
« on: February 13, 2010, 01:54:22 PM »

Does anybody know why the Energy Saving Trust appears to lend its support to products like this which are so thin that they give a solid wall a new U-value of ~ 1.6 W/m2K (still worse than most walls built in modern times)? Does this contribute usefully to the need to reduce UK CO2 emissions 80% or more?

According to the seller's website it is both EST-approved and -recommended.

http://www.mgcltd.co.uk/Products/Thermal_and_Acoustic_Insulation/SEMPATAP_THERMAL/

D.
Logged
Nick Grant
AECBmember

Posts: 1274



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2010, 05:29:48 PM »

Interesting how the thermal images show a lage impact on hedge and window temperatures!


* Screen shot 2010-02-13 at 17.26.45.jpg (101.64 KB, 583x348 - viewed 366 times.)
Logged
Dave Howorth
AECBmember

Posts: 279



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2010, 07:29:10 PM »

The more thermographs I see, the less I trust them. Is there some standard that should be followed when they are published or included in reports?

For example, I'd like to see a photograph taken at the same time (ideally through the same lens, or at least one in the same camera) and I'd like to see some kind of temperature scale, or whatever is appropriate. Not to mention the date and time. For example, the lower after thermograph appears to have been taken in summer, whilst the photograph and before thermograph weren't (the tree).

Cheers, Dave

PS I guess it was possible the windows were changed at the same time the wall was insulated. Perhaps the hedge was painted with low emissivity paint? Can't be somebody fiddling with the images, surely??!!
Logged
Mark Siddall
Moderator

Posts: 1120


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2010, 07:32:19 PM »

It's interesting that the temperature scale is missing and that there is no indication about the time of day/year that the photo's were taken.

Mark
Logged
Nick Grant
AECBmember

Posts: 1274



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2010, 08:04:42 AM »

One of my favourite images was a thermographic image of a proposed office! (Photoshop)

A very powerful tool but so often misunderstood. The seductive pretty images are part of the problem, rather like 3d energy models they give an illusion of a reality when the underlying numbers are not shown (in this case internal and external temperatures and surface temperatures.

Dave, one problem with visible light pic being taken at the same time for outdoor shots is that the thermal image should be done at night to avoid even weak sun changing the surface temperatures.

And yes lack of temp scale renders the images even ore useless as the colours are arbitrary unless set to the same range in the image processing software.

That's the sum of my knowledge, enough to know that there is an awful lot more to know.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
naughty-teens