Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Psi Therm software #38951
    Rachel Mitchell
    Participant

      Thanks Mark and Tom for your replies – its much appreciated

      in reply to: Re: Re: xtratherm cavity fill and thermal bypass #38692
      Rachel Mitchell
      Participant

        Thank you Mark and Kate for your very helpful comments, the client has now decided to go for a full cavity fill with mineral wool which hopefully will address some of the issues you have raised
        I'll have a look at Sally's article- thank you for the link

        Rachel

        Rachel Mitchell
        Participant

          Can anyone advise of a certified passivhaus window and door which also meets secured by design
          many thanks
          Rachel

          in reply to: PHPP and Terraced Houses #38478
          Rachel Mitchell
          Participant

            I also have another MVHR question, I have a large house -600m2 and it will possibly need two domestic MVHR systems to provide the correct amount of supply/extract air
            supply is 403 and extract 540, is this the correct approach or should I be looking at a commercial MVHR unit?

            in reply to: PHPP and Terraced Houses #38477
            Rachel Mitchell
            Participant

              thanks Nick and Toby,
              Nick my next question on how to deal with the MVHR so thanks for answering that one in advance!

              in reply to: MVHR for small units #38470
              Rachel Mitchell
              Participant

                thanks Nick and Dave for your replies is there an issue with single room MEV and air tightness?
                Rachel

                in reply to: MVHR for small units #38467
                Rachel Mitchell
                Participant

                  Does anyone have any knowledge of the FiWi MVHR system which Viking House in Ireland are offering?
                  http://www.viking-house.ie/fine-wire-hrv.html

                  in reply to: MVHR for small units #38466
                  Rachel Mitchell
                  Participant

                    thanks for the advice Mark, I did notice the dB of the unit, and was not aware there was a PH requirement for noise, so that is useful to know
                    I'

                    in reply to: MVHR for small units #38464
                    Rachel Mitchell
                    Participant

                      Thanks for your prompt reply Mark, yes it is a garden office, so one or two people at the most and only in the day time
                      and the challenge has been to find a unit that small enought not to produce over ventuilation
                      what's your view on single room units such as the vent axia HR 25 – could this do the job?

                      the client is looking to try for passivhaus certificaiton so at the moment MVHR is the option being considered

                      in reply to: MVHR and summer bypass in flats #38080
                      Rachel Mitchell
                      Participant

                        thank you Alan and Nick for you comments- do you think that summer bypass should be specified in houses where is there more air volume and I assume more heat loss?

                        On another but similar subject, I have a scheme which has a planning restriction on opening windows- so overheating is a big problem, do you have any suggestions.
                        We can use passive stack, but this is not getting the air changes in SAP or we could over size the MVHR and use this, which works in theory, but I'm worried it will be noisy and drafty in practice, or we could use a centralised extract system but then lose the heat

                        Are there any other solutions?

                      Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)